Selected Work

Positioning work is best judged by the decisions it makes.

The examples below show how Fortify approaches different commercial positioning situations — when the right answer is refinement, and when the position needs to be carried consistently across a wider commercial system.

Two different positioning situations

The right answer depends on what is actually wrong.

One case required refinement of a sound proposition. The other required the position to be carried more consistently through the firm's wider commercial system.

Positioning refinement · APAC private markets

When the proposition is sound, but the buyer still has to work too hard.

An APAC private-markets platform already had a credible category position. The commercial question was not whether to replace it, but whether the right buyers could quickly recognise when the platform was relevant to them.

01 Before

A credible capability-led proposition.

The platform clearly described liquidity and recovery capability across private-market situations, but required the reader to infer whether their own position qualified.

02 Commercial question

Who needs to recognise themselves?

The issue was less about changing the category and more about making the relevant buyer and trigger situations explicit.

03 Judgement

Refine, not reposition.

Keep the core position. Sharpen the buyer, clarify the situations that create urgency, and reorder the narrative around recognition before capability.

04 After

The right buyers meet their situation first.

The narrative now makes it easier for LPs, GPs and funds with stranded or residual positions to understand why the platform may be relevant to them.

The principle

Good positioning work does not always change the headline. Sometimes it changes who recognises themselves in it.

Positioning carried into market · Cross-border advisory

When the commercial problem is larger than the wording.

A cross-border advisory firm had senior capability across multiple areas. The challenge was to ensure the firm, its partners and its market-facing materials reinforced the same commercial direction rather than operating as separate expressions.

01 Before

Broad capability, presented across separate assets.

The firm was represented through a broad range of advisory capabilities and independent market-facing materials.

02 Commercial question

What should all of these expressions reinforce?

The issue was not whether each asset looked professional. It was whether the overall system made the same commercial position easier to understand.

03 Judgement

One position, multiple expressions.

The website was not the strategy. Neither were the credentials, partner visibility or events. Each needed to support the same commercial direction.

04 After

Positioning became a wider commercial system.

The position was carried through credentials, partner visibility, case evidence, events, market content and support for relationship development and follow-through.

The principle

Positioning becomes commercially useful when the rest of the firm can carry it consistently into the market.

The right answer depends on what is actually wrong.

Sometimes a strong proposition only needs refinement. Sometimes a broader commercial structure needs to be aligned around it. And sometimes the Review should conclude that positioning is not the real constraint at all.

01

We do not change a position simply to demonstrate activity. A sound position should be retained.

02

We distinguish communication problems from commercial-positioning problems. Better wording is not always the answer.

03

We look at whether the position can travel through the organisation. A position that only works on the homepage is incomplete.

Start with your own situation

If your firm has evolved, the first question is what the market should understand differently now.